Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (170442)	8/31/2002 1:48:31 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

"You had it right earlier when you said" You are confused. I am right in both cases (as usual ;-) You should not compare scores. But you can compare _relative_ scores if processors are the same in both benchmarks. If you try more relevant data, anandtech.com you would find for the ICC part: For sm2001, P4-2000/A-1533, score ratio was 213/208 = 2.4%; For sm2002, P4-2000/A-1533 the same ratio is 240/213 = 12.6% Co-incidentally, you can do fractions either way, but result is the same - BAPCO sm2002 has been altered to change the relative performance rating. Sounds like the proof is on the surface. - Ali