To: Sam Salomon who wrote (2445 ) 9/3/2002 11:00:34 AM From: Eric L Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9255 re: The IP Business Model (ARM, Qualcomm, Rambus) Thoughts on contrasting variations of a similar business model ... The following excerpt is from a Rule the World (RTW) article about ARM published in June entitled "Arm: The 'Nice' Gorilla" , by Francis Turner.rtwreport.com >> The ARM Market and Business Model The first thing to understand is the market in which ARM operates and the business model it has chosen to use. ARM is a pure intellectual property (IP) company selling the rights to its designs and the know-how to use them. Its customers are the various ASIC and chip manufacturers and designers of the world. Despite the fact that it builds relationships with potential customers of its own customers and with others who will write applications for chips containing its IP, it only receives revenue from the designers and manufacturers who use its cores and other technologies. It has been noted than many IP companies seem to have a problem convincing the market that their IP should be respected and bought. The problem is that these companies seem to try and force their solutions on an industry that resents their attitude and, to put it bluntly, paying continuously for something, which seems, at least in retrospect, to be obvious. The classic examples of this are Qualcomm and Rambus . Qualcomm's CDMA technologies are considered technically superior to other proposed standards, but even ignoring its direct customers (the cellular equipment manufacturers) it has managed to annoy many of the companies that it is targeting. These industries prefer to proceed through committees and consider a single supplier as an anathema. Rambus is perceived as being even worse as its customers believe that it has attempted to hijack the industry standards process. It also appears to have concentrated its sweet-talking on its customers' customers and their other suppliers. Although I suspect that Rambus is, at worst, guilty of 'Suppressi veri' and 'Suggestio falsi', the perceived deception has not contributed to a harmonious relationship between the vendor and the companies that should be its customers. << - Eric -