Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (56592)	9/2/2002 9:17:57 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

No. I don't think it is ludicrous. I check all my posts to make sure I do not use her name. She does not post here. I think it was wrong. IMO Obviously you do not agree. Which is fine. But you can't tell me I don't think it is wrong, because I do, and I check my posts to try to make double sure I do not do it. If she wants to do anything on her thread, that is up to her. But it is not up to me - again MY opinion. I'm not backing off. Look- go read what you wrote. You began to explore everything you thought I could be talking about. You talked about pm's to rambi- and what was in them. You talked about a pm to Kholt, and what was in it. Those were pm's- and you didn't get permission first to use those pm's in public. I stand by everything I have said, in the ORDER I have said it. I am not going to keep going over this same old stuff with you Please don't post the same things to me- and don't tell me I said stuff which I did NOT say, unless you just can't help yourself. In which case, carry on and I'll try to ignore you. This is boring people on this thread that I enjoy having around.

To: E who wrote (56592)	9/2/2002 9:33:18 PM
From: J. C. Dithers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

But you found the use of Rambi's name simply appalling! And now that that's been shown to be ludicrous... You are quite fixated on this. Only a matter of hours ago you were apologizing for using Rambi's real name. Now you are saying it was "ludicrous" for anyone to complain about what you did. Why did you apologize if the criticisms were "ludicrous"? Maybe you were just being polite, which seems to be a fault of yours.<gg> Why did the real person choose the alias "Rambi" on SI? Was that a ludicrous act? Is it up to you to declare that henceforth all are free to refer to that person by her real name inasmuch as she herself has at times done so? The more you insist on talking about this, the more significant your breech of an alias becomes. How many people have to know your real name for it to become (by E's mandate) in the public domain of SI, no longer protected by an alias? I'd like know the cut-off number, so I can tell whether I may be getting close.