SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (42124)9/5/2002 12:04:18 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Aren't you the teeniest bit worried that with all the focus on Iraq, the next attack is likely to come from someplace completely different? Somewhat to his credit, Rumfeld is:

Looking ahead, Mr. Rumsfeld expressed consternation with the "frenzy" over possible military action against Iraq because it distracts from the larger issues: fighting terror and keeping weapons of mass destruction out of the hands of a number of adversaries. nytimes.com

As with all "frenzy" disclaimers from the WH, though, that one is more than a little ironic, as Rumsfeld seems to have contributed his fair share when called upon, and will no doubt continue to do so in the future. Anyway, on FADG, "frenzy R us". What's Debka reporting on the allegedly ongoing invasion these days, anyway?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (42124)9/5/2002 12:05:25 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 281500
 
Nadine: Right now, I feel relatively safe. I know for a fact that attacking Iraq will lead to counterattacks here and worse.