SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (42361)9/6/2002 12:08:03 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
You mean this one??

America: Count Your Dead

By David H. Hackworth

“Medic, Medic, Medic!” is a battlefield cry every warrior who's been to hell and back will never forget. It means a brother is down, and the widow-maker is close at hand. A call that these days, unfortunately, is heard too frequently in Afghanistan.

So far, 40 American warriors have died, and almost 400 have been banged up in that war-ravaged country, where our troops on the ground are clay pigeons stuck in a terrible minefield. Every day their Taliban and al-Qaeda stalkers get stronger as supporters in China, Iran and Pakistan send them better weapons, and the supposedly pro-USA Afghan government keeps releasing POWs who openly say that as soon as they're out of the slammer, they're off to try to kill more Yanks. They and their Pakistani cohorts learn our tactics by trial and error, carefully figuring out how to ratchet up the pain exactly as they did in the past two centuries with the Brits and the Soviets.

Our enemy's strategy is stone simple: to make us bleed at a rate of attrition the American people won't tolerate. And have no doubt that our fanatic opponents are right this moment putting together the same cunning techniques to the same deadly end as the Vietnamese and Somalian rebels before them.

Sadly, they also have the same good shot at scoring, and, in fact, they already almost did during the flawed Operation Anaconda. Since the U.S. military's inception, its senior leaders have seldom learned from the past, so it should be no big surprise that unless “43” and his national-security crew apply some out-of-the-box thinking and dust off the lessons-learned file, they're about to lead our soldiers smack into the middle of another mother-of-all-pasture-pies.

Because this time around, we won't be able to lie and say, “We won," or “The mission is complete,” and pull out our troops the way we did in Vietnam and Somalia, and after the so-called Afghani freedom fighters – including Osama bin Laden and his merry terror band – clobbered the Soviets more than a decade ago.

Instead, we've got to stand tall and do for Afghanistan what we did for Germany and Japan after World War II and Eastern Europe after the Berlin wall came tumbling down. George W. Bush's implied objectives – to win the hearts and minds of the Muslim world and prevent Afghanistan from returning to Taliban-terrorist-state status – were on target. We need to honor the long-term commitment we made to provide stability, reconstruction and humanitarian aid.

The spoiler is that our American soldiers are down in the Afghan mud, hunting and being hunted by crazies who believe that if they can pull off a repeat of Mogadishu and then flash pictures around the world of dead Americans being dragged through some dusty village, we'll run. And while we won't cut after the first such atrocity – “43” is made of sterner stuff than “42” – we will after the 10th or 20th. Remember the 1960s slogan, “Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids did you kill today?”

Right now, Afghanistan is going downhill faster than an out-of-gear Abrams tank. Each day, with the warlords acting increasingly like Mafia dons in a Chicago turf war, there's more instability. The peacekeeping effort is now mainly limited to around the capital. Things are so bad that our Special Forces warriors secure the Afghan president because he can't trust his own people.

For sure, more peacekeeping troops are needed, and they need to be spread across the land. But they shouldn't be American boys. If our combat troops stay in their muddy-boots role, they're just going to continue to be moving targets. So every U.S. combat soldier should be pulled out ASAP, and U.S. support should be limited to aircraft, intel, logistics, dollars and nation-building resources and expertise – making an international nation-building program happen.

Arab countries such as Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Turkey must step in and provide the ground peacekeeping muscle – Muslims helping their Muslim brothers.

Only then will the bleeding stop, and only then will we be able to deliver on our promises and show that we're not a nation of born-again crusaders, but a country dedicated to bringing peace and prosperity to the Arab people and, by extension, to the world.

hackworth.com is the address of David Hackworth's home page. Sign in for the free weekly Defending America column at his Web site. Send mail to P.O. Box 11179, Greenwich, CT 06831. Look for his new book, “Steel My Soldiers' Hearts,” (Rugged Land LLC, New York City).

© 2002 David H. Hackworth



To: LindyBill who wrote (42361)9/6/2002 1:33:40 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi LindyBill; Re: "We can't get away with it, but we would probably be better off to kill off any Al Queda we can find, pull out, and go back in if they get back in power. The threat of us going back in would probably keep them out of power. Hack did a recent column on this, and was pissed about the attrition rate we are suffering,at the moment, in casualties there. We are probably going to take more, and for no good reason."

Well said. But I don't agree with Hackworth's assessment that we're failing in our duties there. (See #reply-17961404) In particular, he wrote: "Each day, with the warlords acting increasingly like Mafia dons in a Chicago turf war, there's more instability."

My analysis of the situation is that it is the warlords that keep the peace in the region. The alternative was the Taliban, who kept a more quiet peace, but the warlords are preferable both to us and to the locals. And I don't seem to be hearing about reports of bombings of wedding ceremonies recently, so I would guess that we're winning hearts and minds.

-- Carl