Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kapkan4u who wrote (170900)	9/10/2002 4:58:16 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Respond to of 186894

Kap, <I am looking forward to local stooges slamming Banias's Performance Rating they way they slammed AMD's.> According to Otellini (your favorite man <G>): - Intel will be clear on which benchmarks they use to come up with the rating. - Intel will be up-front on what the actual performance is. - Intel will not use the performance rating as a replacement for the clock speed. Sounds like the "ModelHurtz" rating AMD should have come up with in the first place. Of course, that assumes AMD's marketing department was smarter than the average 'Droid in the first place. Tenchusatsu

To: kapkan4u who wrote (170900)	9/10/2002 4:59:33 PM
From: greg s	Respond to of 186894

"We'll always be up front on what the clock speed actually is. And we won't use products that are based on the competition."

To: kapkan4u who wrote (170900)	9/10/2002 5:40:48 PM
From: Petz	Respond to of 186894

<I am looking forward to local stooges slamming Banias's Performance Rating they way they slammed AMD's.> Me too. Otellini already claimed that Intel's performance ratings will not be based on comparisons to "older technology." So the first time someone at Intel compares Banias to a P4, that promise is broken. EDIT - Whoops! I forgot! In Intel-speak, only AMD has "older technology." Petz