Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : A to Z Junior Mining Research Site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 4figureau who wrote (1349)	9/12/2002 1:10:20 PM
From: The Vet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5423

I have a huge problem relating these two statements. One of them is obviously wrong, and the difference may be crucial; but which one.. From your post... But the fact that CVG, which is the crown corporation for the Venezuelan government, has been granting mining concessions in the past and granted this one and the fact that the government is behind it suggests to me that Crystallex has won the deposit and the likelihood of lawsuits, well, that’s part of normal. From my earlier post: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 17:55 (GMT-0400) An agreement between Venezuela's state heavy industry holding CVG and Vancouver-based mining company Crystallex International (Amex: KRY) to develop the Las Cristinas gold deposit in the country's Bolivar state would involve subcontracting the Canadian company and not awarding a concession, CVG's mining VP John Armando Madero told BNamericas. "That is their [Crystallex's] decision, to do the work that way... they accepted an operating contract and not a concession, or anything like that," Madero said.