SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: aerosappy who wrote (12869)9/12/2002 8:21:39 PM
From: jim_p  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206323
 
aero,

On the upcoming PeeGoo meeting, I plan to vote YES for the new board. On the issue of the increase in the number of shares, I'm leaning on voting NO unless we can get a better idea of what the increase in shares will be used for prior to the meeting.

Issuing more shares at today's prices will do nothing to help the company or it's current shareholders. In the event there is a need to issue warrants to get the banks to restructure, there are plenty of shares available for that purpose today without an increase.

I don't see any reason why Moe can't disclose what he intends to do with the new shares before we vote for the increase?

I also don't see any reason why he can't come back at a later date after there is a plan in place and ask for the increase.

I would encourage all PeeGoo holders to make sure they get their proxy before the meeting and vote NO for the increase in the number of shares.

As the fifth largest shareholder group, our votes will make a difference.

Jim