Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NOW who wrote (191755)	9/12/2002 7:16:18 PM
From: Rollcast...	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

"Chomsky a conspiracy theorist? Care to back that up?" Why dont you refute it first? Thankfully, Noamy "genocide" Chomsky is also a decrepit, rapidly aging conspiracy theorist.

To: NOW who wrote (191755)	9/13/2002 10:50:37 AM
From: Oblomov	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

I can provide plenty of evidence for this. His oevure is replete with intimations of conspiracy... start with Rethinking Camelot if you don't believe me. Of course, his repeated claim is that he is implying no conspiracy, only the unfolding of a natural process that is latent in the structure of the status quo. Further, he dismisses repeated calls from his detractors for evidence or demonstration of intent on the part of the accused parties, claiming that his method of "relational analysis" permits neither such forensic devices nor a summarization of key points. This is a disingenuous and manipulative method of communication. Essentially, he is claiming that the only way that his ideas can be parsed is to abandon a rational mode of cognition.