Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (43683)	9/13/2002 7:37:47 AM
From: maceng2	Respond to of 281500

That evidence you spoke of, Al Qaida in Northern Iraq.. That report by Goldberg is a few months old now. It could have been verified even with a slow security administration. It could be evidence that Bush is sitting on. Gas victims + Al Qaida + Iraq = War on Iraq, no matter what happened and in what order. If so, there would be no point and letting it go until the last moment before an invasion. It would be enough evidence to let Hussain know he was about to be attacked. The direct assault on the Pentagon (never mind the WTC) linked all the way back to Saddam would be enough to launch whatever strike necessary to neutralize his leadership in my opinion. I remember a remark some USA officer made just after the Pentagon attack... "Whoever did this has just made a huge mistake"