Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: maceng2 who wrote (43786)	9/14/2002 2:17:29 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

These guys got beat, none of them were directly involved in the WTC tragedy, why keep them in jail?? Those southern officers ALSO has to swear and oath of loyalty to the union.. Get these Al-Qaida and Taleban prisoners to swear upon the Koran that they will never again take up arms for the purpose of "waging Jihad", and I might consider releasing them. But remember that many of these militant interpret their religion as making perfectly fine to lie their faces off to "infidels" so long as it's in the name of Allah. (and I know a few so-called "christians" who would feel it perfectly permissible to lie to any muslim captors they might fall prey to). I really don't credit many of these militants as possessing sufficient "honor" to adher to an oath of pacifism. Hawk

To: maceng2 who wrote (43786)	9/14/2002 2:54:45 PM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"These guys got beat, none of them were directly involved in the WTC tragedy, why keep them in jail??" Because they won't stop fighting. They weren't fighting for a cause or a side that has surrendered and ceased hostilities. Why we should have to beat them repeatedly, and then, presumably, release them each time? What are you thinking? Does Britain simply release those convicted of attempted murder once they're convicted, out of magniminity?