Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: slacker711 who wrote (44427)	9/16/2002 7:38:18 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

amazing how much support there was for regime change in Iraq, even prior to 9/11. That is why the "anti-war" movement collapsed so quickly last week. Clinton would have taken stronger action in '98, IMO, if he had't been wrapped up in his personal problems. A threat of invasion to force compliance by Saddam at that time would have invoked "Wagged the Dog!" screams from the right. But it would have been the right thing to do. It is really too bad Clinton's character flaws stopped him from making Foreign Policy moves.