Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (45256)	9/19/2002 9:42:43 AM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

In short, you dish it out pretty freely, in suitable academic garb, but call foul when it's your turn to take it. jmho. Well, not exactly. The tactic is "let's agree to disagree" or "this ground has been plowed" whenever the wings have been pinned. Agreeable and non-confrontational, but evasive nonetheless. You are 100% correct on the geopolitical aspect. If we don't stop Saddam now he will have many nukes, not just the odd untested one. Saddam armed with 10-20 nukes of any size is not something the West should allow. It would mean the destruction of Israel and nuclear blackmail. The case against going into Iraq is sadly and unfortunately bumper sticker-simple: "What has Saddam done to the US?" Hooters will be selling the stickers soon.