Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (45994)	9/22/2002 8:49:33 AM
From: Rascal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"Nor did anyone in the world vote for the US to run roughshod into preemptive action without it's having to make a case for that action. The only place such a case can be made today is in the UN. " Bush set up the quid pro quo. His jist was:"If the UN does not do their job we will." He gives them a chance to act/resolve before we take action. We need terms and definitions of what UN action is.That's why the Congressional Resolution must be worded the way John says. Or was Bush, once again, making it up as he went along. Was his UN speech insincere or more accurately fallacious.