SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (59632)9/24/2002 9:59:43 AM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
How can you judge reliability based on what a person tells you is reliable? For one thing most people don't know the "truth" or anything like it, even when they think they do, and for another people lie, although they don't necessarily tell themselves they are doing that.



To: Neocon who wrote (59632)9/24/2002 11:01:22 AM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
If the facts are
highly unreliable, then we have a situation of "garbage in, garbage out".


Every fact is inherently unreliable.

I have no personal knowledge that Socrates was ever actually condemned to death, or that he in fact died of poison administered by the state. It could all be a fiction, a fable. But even if it were, I would still benefit from reading the dialogues.



To: Neocon who wrote (59632)9/24/2002 2:49:26 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
hmmm
I don't see it that way at all.
What people say is independent of who they are, or whether or not they are telling the truth- for me. Of course I don't depend on other people's words very much, in this venue or anywhere else.