SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (3248)9/25/2002 9:36:47 AM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25522
 
Maybe this should be "Reading Comprehension 101?"

I was not disputing that "companies with lower capital requirements deserve to trade for a higher P/B multiple than companies with higher capital requirements."

My question was "how do you value them?" or "What formula do you use"? How do you put a "fair value" on MSFT? Do you expect to get money from them in a form of a dividend or will they continue to hold a pile of cash that might be better invested elsewhere? Some used to say that if a company has a large pile of cash, then it means it doesn't know how to invest it to grow the business so it should be given back to shareholders. How do YOU value that in your formula?

for the record, I hold MSFT and am wondering about this. Maybe I'd rather have the cash in my pocket than in their treasury if they are not growing?

Kirk



To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (3248)9/25/2002 1:04:00 PM
From: Cary Salsberg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25522
 
RE: "...all else being equal..."

The original statement said that software companies produced more earnings per dollar of book value than AMAT and therefore deserved a higher P/B.

Earnings and book value do not have a well defined relationship, so I questioned the statement.

"...all else being equal..." still does not create a well defined relationship.