SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pezz who wrote (23580)9/25/2002 9:44:46 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello Pezz, I got to the office early today, pondered the same thoughts as you here <<Don't wanna hafta go back to work>>, and sold half of my taels of paper gold at 4% gain from 1 month average holding period.

I will buy the paper gold back when spot price hits below USD 311. <<Duzn't sound too exciting>> ... you are correct, my machinations are boring, but effective under the circumstances. I rationalize by believing I serve a social function in providing liquidity to a paper derivative of a useless metal that has the same status as the stone disks on the island of Yap;0)

Message 17980716

You can trade paper gold as well, at kitco.com

Pretty soon, at the rate we are going with interest rate, stock and real estate prices, we will revert to a world of gold trading, as in "daddy daddy, what do you do?" and "er, eh, I trade gold".

Chugs, Jay



To: pezz who wrote (23580)9/25/2002 10:01:04 PM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Pezz, after posting my immediate preceding post to you, I tapped a few keys on the PC and sold the other half of my paper gold position.

My physical gold (Big Financial Reset Button) is not for trading, and is not for selling unless there is a real need, as opposed to dictated by price action.

My paper gold is for trading, today's sale is my first ever, and the 'action' feels good:0)

Chugs, Jay



To: pezz who wrote (23580)9/26/2002 12:31:14 AM
From: TobagoJack  Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Pezz, the freedom of on-line trading is dangerous. Bank of China share fell to HKD 7.8 (USD 1.00) in the global slaughter of equity, even though the recently IPO-ed share is supposed to be supported by 'big hands' at HKD 8.3-8.5/share. I owned it, sold it, profited from it, and today, own it again, intending to ride it for a slim gain of 8% by Xmas.

In these days of slim to negative pickings, all carrion must be examined in detail, and cleaned off in full.

Chugs, Jay



To: pezz who wrote (23580)9/27/2002 11:00:57 AM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Pezz, The real world news flow remains horrid and seeming to, impossibly, get worse with each passing cyber trading session.

Is tonight the night to buy some shares that will hopefully blossom into an expensive Christmas present by, er, Christmas time 2002? What will it be? Should I buy CD, GE, and/or MO, directly, or via the shorting of Puts?

I just received my September issue of The Gloom, Boom & Doom Report from Dr. Marc Faber. Precious, life saving, and a good read as well.

According to the Doctor, bubbles beget bubbles. The new home sales bubble, itself an outgrowth of the equity bubble, amount to one million units annually, and at the average price of little less than USD 200k per unit, and if at 100% financing, would require mortgage debt expansion of USD 200 billion. Actual mortgage debt grew at USD 600 billion, and the difference of USD 400 billion ended up in the other bubble – consumer spending, and particularly for autos. The auto industry is on track to sell 17 million vehicles for the year, the fourth year in a role at such sales level. Annual auto sales before the 1990s averaged 14.6 million units. Auto ownership for driving age population has risen from 90% to 99.8% in the past 10 years, and “Americans could buy somewhere between 30% and as much as 50% fewer vehicles per year for four or five years and still very adequately meet their transportation needs”. In the mean nasty time, both GM and Ford are below their 1990 highs, and GM has unfounded pension/health care liabilities of USD 61 billion. All this, and the economy is not even in recession yet.

The rest of the report discusses the ‘giving back of 6 to 12 years of bubbly gains’, ‘Dow at 2,500, Nasdaq at 350, SUNW at USD 0.5, CSCO at USD 0.08, NOK at USD 0.15, ORCL at USD 0.12, AOL at USD 0.05 (1990 prices)’. The good Doctor is not suggesting that these shares will reach those prices, but he is saying there still exists considerable downside risk.

Enough said, and with that I wait for another day to buy my Christmas present generator, because I want to preserve wealth as related to you 13 months ago (yes, we are still on this aging script):

Message 16227919
“my fantastic vision of wealth … idly meandering amongst coconut palms, fringing a blue lagoon, dotted with thatch-roofed huts cooled by antique electric fans, summer all year round, connected by broadband and satellite com, and simply complemented with oodles and boodles of Caterina, Jade, Veronique, Ursula, Jasmine, Etsuko, Suzie, India, all frolicking in an ambient temperature and gently surfing water, swaying to the undulating beat of "do that to me again and again", with Gretchen and Gloria back at the open-air kitchen preparing sandwiches and mixed drinks, and Alexus carefully filtering home-made beer through an ice filter held up by Kiki, standing next to Kimiko, searing some Kobe beef on the grill.

Did I leave anything or anyone out by inattention to detail?

What do you think? Oops, that’s right, I forgot, you like the enterprise of busily treading QCOM New Economy scripts.

Grace believes real wealth is busy money, wildly flopping in the equity sea, not for a moment considering the possibility that true wealth is instead idle comfortable self-indulgent lazy unkempt piggish heft, soaking in a protected primordial lagoon, surrounded by beauty and adored by youth, rapping with buddies of equivalent disposition and complementary temperament.

As such, any one aiming for true wealth must act to panic, panic first, run fastest, jumping over others, before the already licking flame engulfs all within the Temple of Greenspan.”

Even though some in this den, like ACF Mike as of April, was still not tuned in to the rhythmic frequency of global debt-ly collapse:

Message 17310144
“You're starting to sound like the other debt wackos, DJ.
… It's two years now since the Nasdaq crash and there has been no significant economic impact. Personal bankruptcies and consumer loan charge-offs are within the normal range.”

Well, we are about to move beyond the comfort range, at least by popular media reports:

usatoday.com
kansascity.com

Chugs, Jay



To: pezz who wrote (23580)9/27/2002 3:52:59 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Pezz, Tonight's report: I woke up early, checked the TV screen, assured that it was all crimson, and decided to take the trouble to boot up the PC and establish cyber link. Purchased a tranche of Cendant (CD) @11/shr, and shorted a bunch of CD January Call Strike 12.5, and a bouquet of CD January Put Strike 10 for a combined premium of about 3/shr. Maybe I will deserve another platinum watch or a few months of sustenance in time for Chinese New Years.

I will travel to the 3 Gorges Dam site for the weekend in a few hours and probably will not be checking on the thread this weekend. Next week is a public holiday, and I will again spend some down time;0)

Chugs, Jay



To: pezz who wrote (23580)9/30/2002 5:41:18 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Pezz, Today's Report: Bought starter stakes in CRESY @ 4.72 and IRS @ 5.65. I am assembling an unpopular portfolio that is in part made up of:

- Gloom (AOL, CD in USA)
- Doom (Cresud and IRSA in Argentina)
- Terror (Hub Power of Pakistan),
- Fear (Zimbabwe Platinum),
- War (BP, RD, XOM)
- Intrigue (Bank of China in Hong Kong)
- Politically Incorrectness (Petro China, China National Offshore Oil Co - CNOOC, Sino Petroleum - SinoPec),
- Crapshoot (a private equity approach to public listed ventures - recommended by LLCF (DAK):
siliconinvestor.com ), and
- Aztec-ism (gold and platinum – physical/shares)

If these do not go up eventually, they will go down;0)

Ref:
Message 18054383

Chugs, Jay



To: pezz who wrote (23580)10/1/2002 10:54:56 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hello Pezz, Today's Report: Went crazy and ...
(a) Bet on the Scots - Doubled my existing stake in The Hong Kong and Shanghai Banking Corporation (HSBC) via the HK Stock Exchange (code 5 under home.boom.com.hk ; main listing on London Exchange) at HKD 81.25/shr. P/E 17.6, yield 4.78%.

If I know the Scots, they should be preparing to buy cheap in blown apart markets soon.

and

(b) Wager on the Shanghainese Chinese - Bought a starting stake in Shanghai Industrial (code 363) via same HK Stock Exchange. P/E 8.8, yielding 4.14%, engaged in sihl.com.hk i.e. infrastructure/logistic, consumer products/retail, automotive parts, IT.

If I know my Shanghainese, they should be taking over from Asia ex-Japan, and then Japan soon.

I am also inspired by the DJIA ramporama, and am thinking that at worst I ride the shares up until Xmas/New Years/Chinese New Years, dump them, and at best I get on the train early for Emerging Market China Concept Rational Mania, an abracadabra that must surely follow global gloom, cushioned by dividend yields substantially better than US Treasury 10/30 year notes.

Chugs, Jay



To: pezz who wrote (23580)10/3/2002 8:50:06 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Pezz, Today's Report: The US dock strike is having an effect, possibly triggering a cleansing of the HK valuation across the financial-scape. Hutchison is a global port and telecom operator, and a HK landlord, and Li&Fung is a company specializing in Asia sourcing. Management of both are very good, and accounts are probably clean. I may buy some if Hong Kong has a minus 900-1000 pts day, a common enough occurrence.

I do not find it easy to buy during distress due to a heightened awareness of devastating danger at possibly every twist and turn in the financial-scape.

Chugs, Jay

Hang Seng falls through 9,000 barrier

scmp.com
Friday, October 4, 2002

JON OGDEN and DAVID WILDER
The Hang Seng Index plunged below 9,000 points to a one-year low yesterday as a strike by US dock workers added to growing fears about the health of Hong Kong's economy.

Exporters were among the hardest hit as the blue-chip benchmark dived 125.03 points, or 1.37 per cent, to close at 8,984.32 points, its lowest since September 21 last year.

In Japan, the Nikkei 225 index also dropped below 9,000 points, shedding 112.9 points to close at a 19-year low of 8,936.43 on fears a tough new stance on bad loans by the government would spark a fresh wave of bankruptcies in the fragile economy.

Early afternoon trading in the US, saw the Dow Jones Industrial Average down 36.13 points at 7,719.48.

In Hong Kong, Hutchison Whampoa slumped 3.6 per cent to $42.80, its lowest close in four years, while trading firm Li & Fung slid 6.08 per cent to $6.95.

"A lot of the exporters have been absolutely hammered," said Jonathan Asante, a fund manager with Framlington Investment Management. "A lot of the exporters are going to be hurt [by the strike] but it is a buying opportunity because I don't think the strike is going to last long."

The worries about the dock strike added to selling on rumours that ratings agency Standard & Poor's would downgrade the SAR's credit rating due to the government's ballooning budget deficit and the durability of the Hong Kong dollar peg.

Forward rates - which indicate the future value of the Hong Kong dollar - blew out as some investors made speculative bets that the currency peg would be abandoned. The market talk was inaccurate and no imminent move to downgrade Hong Kong's A-plus foreign currency ratings was in the works, Ping Chew, S&P's associate director of sovereign ratings, told the Post.

"I can't categorically say there won't be any action, it would be improper of me to say so. But the pressure for a ratings change or an outlook change is not apparent," said Mr Chew.

Hong Kong dollar forward rates have been under pressure since Wednesday when the government announced a budget deficit of $56 billion for the first five months of the financial year.

Some commentators worry that persistent deficits will fast erode fiscal reserves, which have fallen from $444 billion in March 2000 to $316.4 billion.

"So far we don't think these [factors] have enough impact on the rating yet. The government is still sitting on a pile of cash and that gives them the flexibility to absorb the deficit right now," said Mr Chew.

The currency market moves indicate investors are willing to accept an exchange rate of more than $7.82 per US dollar for the ability to lock in the rate one year from now, even though the currency is pegged at $7.80.

"All of this reflects that Hong Kong as an economy is performing miserably," said James Malcolm, regional currency strategist at JPMorgan.

Raymond Tam, a spokesman for Financial Secretary Antony Leung Kam-chung, said there was no plan to change the peg.

And there are no concrete signs that large local firms are betting against the currency, with analysts saying action is confined to professional investors.

"It's just a market play. A real concern [about the peg] would be a signal for much higher rates," said Frederick Laine, regional head of fixed income and derivatives for Credit Lyonnais.



To: pezz who wrote (23580)10/15/2002 11:38:00 PM
From: TobagoJack  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74559
 
Hi Pezz, Today's Report: Sold

Message 18060919

<<(a) Bet on the Scots >> at HK$ 86, recognize gain in HK, and maybe will do same in US tonight.

How is that for LTBH;0?

Chugs, Jay