Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BelowTheCrowd who wrote (171282)	9/27/2002 1:25:23 AM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: Elimination of competition won't make a whole lot of difference as to what people are willing to pay A very large percentage of computer purchases are for businesses and cannot be deferred. The CPU isn't a particularly large part of the system's cost, these days, meaning that Intel sees a fairly inelastic demand curve. Consider that Microsoft's gross profit on a typical desktop sold today is something like $250, while Intel's is close to $75 - note that Microsoft's marginal cost for OEM windows + office is near zero, while Intel has to ship something. If Intel had a monopoly as strong as Microsoft's, they'd almost certainly be able to double their gross margins, and probably triple them.

To: BelowTheCrowd who wrote (171282)	9/27/2002 11:58:53 AM
From: geoffrey Wren	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

"The problem is the very flexible demand for new PCs, which won't change much until we have some sort of new applications that really demand new ones." About new applications, Microsoft may be trying to help Intel indirectly. People send me files on Excel and Word 2000, and my 1997 versions of Excel won't open, and Word gives me hundreds of pages of static. (Those boys at Microsoft must still be chuckling about how they encourage upgrades). But generally on applications, you are right to say few people will want a new computer to run updated word processing and spreadsheet files. However, perhaps new auxiliary equipment will be a driver for computer upgrades. New printers are definitely better than old, and getting quicker and sharper every year. Also, old printers break. Either way, an updated computer is necessary. I might still be using my old Pentium 120 if it were not for the fact my HP5 broke about a year ago. Flat panel monitors are getting popular, and within 3 years will be very popular. Many older computes have few or no USB connectors. I suspect the same push to upgrade occurs to those who want to add use of a new scanner, MP3 player, digital camera, etc. This should be a background demand that is already showing up in sales, but may pick up when the economy picks up (more people buying digital cameras, buying LCD screens, etc.)