Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (1772)	9/29/2002 1:14:21 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8683

...comparison of late 1930s Germany to current Iraq is preposterous. The comparison to early '30's Germany is better. He hasn't had a chance to develop his empire into an equivalent of late '30's Germany because we stepped in and blocked his plans. ... including those chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons that we were selling Iraq back in the 1980s. You've frequently said the US created Saddam and gave him WMD's including bio, chemical, and nuclear. I don't believe any of the above but I also can deduce that you don't either. Because if you really believed these claims you would also think it is America's responsibility to rectify the situation by removing the problem we created - Saddam. But you don't. Therefore, your claims are insincere. I'm glad you've given up that ridiculous argument that Germany was attacking us in WWI. Germany sank American ships leading to America's entry into WWI as I showed in an earlier post. You failed to answer this question: Well, Saddam expelled arms inspectors years ago. So what do you want to do about it?