Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: propitious7 who wrote (27312)	9/30/2002 4:32:15 PM
From: JohnG	Respond to of 197233

propitious. QCOM did present an alternative time keeping approach.

To: propitious7 who wrote (27312)	9/30/2002 7:22:01 PM
From: Kayaker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197233

WCDMA Network Deployments: Asynchronous vs. Synchronous cdmatech.com

To: propitious7 who wrote (27312)	9/30/2002 10:06:46 PM
From: samim anbarcioglu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 197233

Hi prop, kayaker came up with a link where they described the differences between synch and asynch wcdma (post 27319). Do you think it is worth trying to circumvent the GPS (satellite) solution? I think it is complete bafoonery. Both technically and politically. The atomic clock that I refer to is the NIST (national inst of standards and technology) clock that they keep in Boulder Colorado, from which they radio broadcast the official time. nist.time.gov for the eastern time. nist.time.gov for other regions. nist.gov home page.