Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Win Smith who wrote (152661)	9/30/2002 10:49:56 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1586434

Ted, this is my favorite ref on recent Afghan history. From '96, it's a lot scarier in retrospect. Bin Laden was well enough known even then, it turns out. From theatlantic.com; Thanks, Win. What's interesting about that period of time is why we felt the need to arm the Afghans. I understand the Russians were trying to take over the country but what exactly was the special interest we were trying to protect.......downtown Kabul, opium, the sand, what? All the money that was blown. Its amazing. And of course, when questioned as to why we are spending this money........."you can't let those commies take over the world" would have been the answer. "They're evil and powerful and they will nuke us one of these days." The subject changes but the rhetoric remains the same. ;~(( ted