Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Silver_Bullet who wrote (1850)	10/1/2002 12:17:05 PM
From: calgal	Respond to of 8683

jewishworldreview.com

To: Silver_Bullet who wrote (1850)	10/1/2002 12:46:44 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8683

FT re: t is my feeling that attacking Iraq will just add more fuel to the Terrorist fire, not remove some. if you give in into terrorism the long term effects on economy would be devastating....... "Adding more reasons for terrorists to act will in turn keep things very uncertain," it is the same point as above but still nothing adds more uncertainty than constant threat and dependance..... require tighter security = bigger gov't, which will hurt global trade, travel and our economy. you mean military and police force, true but you are not looking at cost/benefit but just cost which creates a one-sided view.... I ask why is the Bush Administration more scared of Saddam than his neighboring countries or other members of the UN security Council (France and Russia)? who is more likely to use WMD? (a) Russia (b) France (c) Iraq hint: do you need one? .... <ggggg> -Albert

To: Silver_Bullet who wrote (1850)	10/1/2002 5:29:18 PM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 8683

FT, Re: I ask why is the Bush Administration more scared of Saddam than his neighboring countries or other members of the UN security Council (France and Russia)? Bush is, as usual, lying when he talks about Iraq being a security threat to the U.S. This is just propaganda proposed to cover his insane blood lust and by extension, his willfully evil desire to transfer the wealth of the American taxpayer to a cabal of criminal war racketeers. Like his Poppy at the Carlyle Group. ***************************** I has a delightful conversation with my lawyer brother-in-law last night. When I mentioned the U.S. Department of Justice........... he immediately corrected me. He said that in the U.S. we have a "legal" system. We do not have a "justice" system. I couldn't disagree. Salaams, Ray