SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48630)10/1/2002 6:43:19 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
A couple of things: Bush said..." a report came out of the Atomic -- the IAEA -- that they were six months away from developing a weapon. I don't know what more evidence we need." that was refuted...."We need more, because that evidence (Bush's assertion)doesn't exist, as an IAEA spokesman told Curl."

So the Bush admin says this week: Iraq's biological and chemical weapons stockpiles and its attempt to attain a nuclear capability are an immediate threat to U.S. security interests, the Bush administration is urging both Congress and the U.N. Security Council to approve resolutions authorizing the use of military force if Iraq does not abide by past demands to disarm.

Over and over again, repeatedly, ad nauseum, oops ~redundancy...folks here have said Saddam has nuclear while the President just as adamantly says he has to the Potential to go nuclear.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48630)10/1/2002 7:06:20 PM
From: Rascal  Respond to of 281500
 
<<"My question is, what's changed? Why would Congress want to weaken a resolution?" Bush said. Saddam, he said, is "more of a threat four years later.">>

What's changed?

Your Press Secretary supported putting as bullet in Saddam's head in a PUBLIC OFFICIAL briefing.

Another reason to doubt the skill set and motives of the current Administration.

This is a disaster. Handled very, very poorly.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48630)10/1/2002 9:17:04 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
The president's spokesman, addressing questions about the cost of a war in Iraq, said Saddam Hussein's exile or assassination-- "the cost of one bullet if the Iraqi people take it on themselves"-- would be both preferable and cheaper.

"Regime change is welcome in whatever form it takes," White House press secretary Ari Fleischer said.


Foot and mouth disease of a very high order. He'll be talking his way out of these comments for the rest of his public life.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (48630)10/1/2002 9:20:01 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Bush just wants war...Bush Resists Compromise Iraq Resolution

Karen, are you familiar with the term "Potempkin Village"??

I suggest that the UN is only interested in a "Potempkin" inspection process.

Form over substance...

Is that what you want?? Another white-wash?

Hawk