Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : My House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (1883)	10/2/2002 12:20:40 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7689

Do you doubt he is trying to get a nuclear capabilty? Of course I don't doubt that. So are Iran and Libya (which is farther along in its program). The N.Koreans have them already, Syria has advanced CBW programs. My question is, is the plan to conquer the world, country by offensive country? Is that the plan? If it's not, why isn't it, if invasion is the only way to make ourselves safe from the threat from Iraq? If it is, do Americans think that's a good plan, and that we can we pull it off? Here's Parry's argument, and his presentation of the risks: consortiumnews.com Here's the National Review's argument: nationalreview.com Neither addresses the other's points. I have no idea what the right thing to do is. My priority is for this country, and Western Civilization, to survive. If at all possible. <g>, but not <ggg>