Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (171384)	10/1/2002 9:24:18 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

OT John, I too feel uneasy about a policy of pre-emptive strikes. If we have to do it, it should be carried out only under the strictest of conditions. Once again, I don't feel like carrying this OT too far. Let's save that for the Unmodded AMD thread. ;-) Tenchusatsu

To: Road Walker who wrote (171384)	10/2/2002 2:28:15 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 186894

RE:"I guess I just don't understand foreign policy." Neither do a lot of politicians etc.

To: Road Walker who wrote (171384)	10/2/2002 10:31:44 AM
From: willcousa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

I keep hearing the mantra that we only attack those who attack us first. Iraq never attacked us prior to the gulf war but we went to war with them because they attacked Kuwait. If we attack Iraq now is it a new war or just a continuation of the old one based upon the fact that Iraq has never kept its peace agreement? Also, how much of a threat does another country have to be before one would change the "I only hit others after I have been hit" policy? Is that a good policy for today's world?