SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (61088)10/7/2002 3:12:20 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
By the way, I spent some time reading almost all of the published non- fiction of Ayn Rand, including a number of issues of the Objectivist Newsletter, and discussing them with a confirmed Objectivist, after I graduated from college. I have read "Anthem", and made a good faith effort to finish "Atlas Shrugged", although the terrible writing finally defeated me.

As far as the scheme being settled in my mind for a long time, that is actually not true. I have frequently revisited the subject, and looked at it with somewhat fresh eyes. I used to re- read the Nicomachean Ethics every year, for about a decade. I have re- read Kant's "Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals" numerous times, as well as Nietzsche's "Beyond Good and Evil", and other texts. I developed a new respect for the Constractarians in the last 3 or 4 years, and, I think, finally understood Hobbes adequately. I have come to a greater appreciation of the pertinence of Hegel fairly recently. Most of what I have laid out, in this particular round of argument, is, in fact, new, although some of it existed embryonically in my thought.

I do not think you intend to defend sociopaths. But the definition of a sociopath is someone who fails to internalize a system of values, and is indifferent to the effects of his behavior on society. The only sort of person who is incapable of embarassment, guilt, or shame is a sociopath.....