SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (61249)10/5/2002 6:03:26 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I thought this was a bit iffy.

<<Suppose such a report is filed when you send money to your children in college, and the resulting investigation causes you harm. Do you have any recourse against the clerk or his employer? No! Federal law provides protection from civil liability for all reports of suspicious transactions made to appropriate authorities, including supporting documentation. This means that the clerk cannot be prosecuted or sued, even if they falsify or manufacture evidence to support the report!>>

OTOH, what harm could be done. Why would a clerk falsify something? So I don't see much of a problem. I did think it odd, though, that he law concerned itself with such small amounts of money.