SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DaiTN who wrote (80900)10/10/2002 9:16:54 AM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
DAI HOW DOES INVEST TWICE IN ECONNECT AND NOT GET OUT BEFORE THE TRADING HALT? HAS THE FBI SENT YOU A SUBPOENA TO FIND OUT WHAT YOUR CONVERSATIONS WHEN WITH THOMAS S HUGHES? DID YOU BUY YOUR SHARES USING THE CASH PAD? BE A MAN AND CALL THE FBI AND COMPLAIN ABOUT THE EVIL NAKED SHORT SELLERS. IS YOUR BITTERNESS AGAINST ELGINDY BECAUSE OF HIS RESEARCH THAT HALTED ECONNECT THE FIRST TIME?

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Litigation Release No. 17709 / September 4, 2002
United States v. Thomas S. Hughes CR-02-M-1648 (USDC C.D. Cal)

THOMAS S. HUGHES INDICTED FOR SECURITIES FRAUD AND CONTEMPT

The Commission announced today that, on August 27, 2002, Thomas S. Hughes was indicted by a grand jury impaneled by the United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California on seven criminal charges, including three counts of fraud under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, three counts of wire fraud and one count of contempt. The indictment alleges that, since at least July 19, 2002, Hughes has engaged in a fraudulent scheme by issuing false and misleading public statements - specifically press releases and website content - that artificially inflated the price of eConnect, whose stock was then publicly quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board. The press releases and website content falsely claimed that eConnect had received a $20 million investment in "AA" asset-backed bonds, that eConnect had begun a stock repurchase program of its shares and that eConnect had received a $964,000 purchase order for its principal product, suggesting that a legitimate company had a relationship to the company that actually placed the order. In reality, the indictment alleged: (1) the bonds were not "AA" rated or registered so that they could be traded publicly; (2) there was no stock repurchase program; and (3) there was no relationship between the company that placed the $964,000 purchase order and the legitimate company identified in the press release. The indictment also charges Hughes with criminal contempt of a permanent injunction against him obtained by the Commission in April 2000 in the case SEC v. eConnect and Thomas S. Hughes, Civil Action Number CV-00-2959 MMM (RCx)(C.D. Cal.)(Lit. Rel. No. 16481).

In a related proceeding, the Commission obtained emergency relief against Hughes and others, including an asset freeze, in Los Angeles federal court on August 8, 2002, based on its prima facie showing that Hughes and others violated the federal securities laws based upon the scheme described above. On August 16, 2002, the Honorable Nora M. Manella, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, granted the Commission's request for a preliminary injunction and continued the asset freeze. The Commission's complaint charges Hughes with violations of Sections 10(b) and 16(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 16a-3 thereunder.

This case is the product of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission, the United States Attorney's Office in Los Angeles, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which received assistance from NASD Regulation, Inc.

For further information, please see Litigation Release Nos. 17670 and 17694.





sec.gov

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 09/04/2002



To: DaiTN who wrote (80900)10/11/2002 8:57:58 PM
From: StockDung  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
DaiTN, ISNT IT INTERESTING HOW MATT BROWN OF INVESTORS HUB HELPED EXPOSE THE MASSIVE FRAUD KNOWN AS ECONNECT. BECAUSE WITHOUT HIS INITIAL INFORMATION GIVEN BY HIM TO ANTHONY ELGINDY, HE WOULD NOT HAVE EVEN KNOW ABOUT ECONECT?

HOW IRONIC THAT HIS WEB SITE INVESTORSHUB.COM WOULD HELP PROMOTE THIS MASSIVE FRAUD THE SECOND TIME AROUND. investorshub.com

THINK WHAT THIS LEAD TO. THE WHOLE BERMUDA SHORT STING OPERATION HAPPENED BECAUSE OF STEPHEN C. SAYRE OFF SHORE ACCOUNT. MATT BROWN SHOULD BE VERY PROUD OF HELPING EXPOSE ONE OF THE LARGEST ROUND UP OF OFFSHORE MONEY LAUDERERS, AND CROOKS IN RECENT TIMES. IT EVEN LEAD TO MARK VALINETINES DEMISE. TO THINK AT FIRST THAT MATT BROWN HAD ACTUALLY TOUTED ECONECT. ragingbull.lycos.com

MATT SHOULD BE VERY PROUD OF TAKING CARE OF THESE INTERNATIONAL CROOKS AND MANIPULATERS

HOPEFULLY SOME DAY SOMEONE WRITES A BOOK ABOUT THE WHOLE ECCONECT AFFAIR

==================================

Posted by: IH Admin (Matt)
In reply to: kkgd who wrote msg# 2948 Date:8/7/2002 8:20:51 PM
Post #of 2987

Glad they finally got their act together.

And I'm sure it's still all my fault, right? <g>

==============================================

Policy Documents
Decisions & Orders

Document Sub-category: Decisions
Document No.: 2001/04/13
Subject: STEPHEN C. SAYRE, et. al. [Sec. 151]
Amendments:
Published Date: 04/20/2001
Effective Date: 04/13/2001


______________________________

2001 BCSECCOM 420

COR# 00/099

IN THE MATTER OF THE SECURITIES ACT
R.S.B.C. 1996, C. 418

AND

IN THE MATTER OF STEPHEN C. SAYRE,
INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL REPORTS, INC., SILVER SCREEN
INDUSTRIES, INC. AND PREMIER FILM ADVENTURES, INC.

AND

IN THE MATTER OF THE BANK OF MONTREAL

Direction to Freeze Property Under Section 151

[para 1]
1. WHEREAS staff of the British Columbia Securities Commission (the "Staff") has represented to the Commission that:

1.1 A Temporary Restraining Order has been issued at the request of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") pursuant to an emergency civil injunctive action by the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, on April 8, 2000, against Stephen C. Sayre ("Sayre"), Independent Financial Reports, Inc. ("IFR"), Silver Screen Industries, Inc. ("Silver Screen") and Premier Film Adventures, Inc. ("Premier Film") to freeze all of Sayre's, IFR's and Silver Screen's assets, including all accounts at any bank, financial institution or brokerage firm held in their name, for their benefit, or over which they have control.

1.2 The action was taken in respect of a complaint by the SEC which allege that the Parties made false and misleading statements concerning the securities of eConnect, Inc. ("eConnect"), an issuer quoted on the NASD OTC Bulletin Board, for the purpose of manipulating the price of the securities of eConnect, in violation of SEC laws.

1.3 IFR and Sayre appear to have distributed recommendations concerning eConnect through Internet connections, which appeared on Internet Web sites such as Silicon Investor, Raging Bull and Big Charts.

1.4 IFR and Sayre realized, according to the SEC, at least $1,435,997 U.S. in profits through their sales of the securities of eConnect, after they made their recommendations.

1.5 Sayre is the sole officer and director of IFR and is the president, treasurer, and secretary of Silver Screen. He has no training in financial analysis, he runs a tree trimming business, and is involved occasionally in the film industry.

1.6 On March 15 and 17, 2000, Sayre, through an account in the name of Silver Screen maintained at the Bank of America in Las Vegas, Nevada ("Bank of America"), allegedly wire transferred a total $810,425.00 U.S., to the branch of the Bank of Montreal located at 595 Burrard Street in Vancouver, British Columbia ("BOM"), for deposit to the account of Exchange Bank and Trust Inc. ("EBT"). On March 17, 2000, Sayre, through the Silver Screen account maintained at the Bank of America, allegedly wire transferred $400,000 U.S., to the BOM, for deposit to the account of Sterling International Bank ("Sterling").

1.7 On April 5, 2000, Sayre, through an account in the name of Premier Film maintained at the Bank of America, allegedly wire transferred a further $130,000 U.S., to the BOM, for deposit to the account of EBT.

1.8 It appears that the foregoing amounts were illegal profits obtained from the sale of the securities of eConnect based upon the recommendations made by IFR and Sayre on Internet Web sites.

1.9 The EBT and Sterling accounts held at the BOM appear to be linked to the Silver Screen and Premier Film accounts held at the Bank of America, and are the ones to which monies were transferred from accounts evidently controlled by Sayre.

1.10 It appears that Sayre may be using accounts in British Columbia to avoid the laws of the United States with respect to those monies and may be using British Columbia as a haven to conceal funds gained by illegal or criminal activity. In addition, if Sayre was involved in trading in this jurisdiction, the funds may represent fraudulent transactions pursuant to section 57 and 57.1 of the Securities Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 418 (the "Act").

[para 2]
2. AND WHEREAS the Commission has appointed each of Wayne Armistead and Linda Milani under section 142 of the Act, to investigate, inquire into and examine the records of, and in the possession and control of, the Bank of Montreal, Sayre, IFR, Silver Screen and Premier Film, among others, with respect to the trading in, and the promotion of, the securities of eConnect from January 1, 2000, forward.

[para 3]
3. NOW THEREFORE the Commission, considering it in the public interest, orders under section 151 of the Act, that the branch of the Bank of Montreal located at 595 Burrard Street, in Vancouver, British Columbia, hold any funds, securities, exchange contracts or other property, which Sayre, IFR, Silver Screen, Premier Film, EBT or Sterling, may have on deposit, under its control or safekeeping on behalf of the named parties, or any other entity or account in which any of the named parties have a beneficial interest.

[para 4]
4. AND THE COMMISSION FURTHER ORDERS that Sayre, IFR, Silver Screen, Premier Film, EBT and Sterling, refrain from withdrawing any funds, securities, exchange contracts or other property held at the branch of the Bank of Montreal located at 595 Burrard Street, in Vancouver, British Columbia, pursuant to this order.

[para 5]
DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, on April 13, 2000.

Joyce C. Maykut, Q.C., Vice Chair