Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (51030)	10/11/2002 9:16:27 AM
From: Alastair McIntosh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

O.T. Hawkmoon, don't you think its wise to contain all sources of radioactivity. Of course, it would be wise to start with the more radioactive sources and work down to the less radioactive sources. Since granite is more radioactive than depleted uranium we simply must provide containment for the rock in the Canadian shield. If that task is daunting perhaps we should start with all those fashionable granite countertops. Al

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (51030)	10/11/2002 9:27:04 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Depleted Uranium-238 It is so easy to dupe people about radioactivity. The Anti-Nuke types have been getting away with it for years. I would like to set one of them down next to a box that has a radioactive sign on it, and tell them, "Hey, don't worry about that, it only has a half-life of one hour!"