SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (51181)10/11/2002 3:01:47 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 281500
 
Whether politicized or no, the CIA's track record in intelligence does not inspire confidence at this point.

I would be more encouraged by it except for Pollack's assessment. Pollock used to analyze Iraq for the CIA.

I'd like to think that Saddam won't attack unless provoked. He's such a nice man, and never caused anybody any harm.

So why won't he just make nice and let UNMOVIC do its job?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (51181)10/11/2002 3:25:07 PM
From: jcky  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Whether politicized or no, the CIA's track record in intelligence does not inspire confidence at this point.

That's not the point. It isn't the CIA's credibility that is at stake here: it is this administration's.

Jumping to conclusions, beating the war drums, and fabricating intelligence to justify war.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News