Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (51221)	10/11/2002 3:25:39 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 281500

Yes, it appears that things aren't nearly so dire as suggested, doesn't it?

To: Ilaine who wrote (51221)	10/11/2002 4:51:28 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Hi CobaltBlue; Re: "Maybe the people who keep claiming that the US is acting unilaterally can't read, so let's just make a list for them. From the article you cite, here's the list: Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Qatar acknowledge that their countries may be used as bases for attacks on Iraq." Kuwait has announced that they will not be involved with an attack on Iraq without UN sanction as recently as a few days ago. I would guess that I could extract similar statements from Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Oman and Qatar. Do you have public statements from any of those nations (from their own words, not some neocon interpreting what they really mean) suggesting that they are signing up for a war not directly sanctioned by the United Nations? -- Carl