Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (307729)	10/12/2002 2:47:58 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769670

Yes ray dumb ray, 52 thousand plus say....YES Do You Support The Decision By Congress To Authorize Force Against Iraq? That 79% is bunk ray dumb ray. That was a push poll worded question... LOL..... have a nice day vote.com

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (307729)	10/12/2002 4:17:04 PM
From: H-Man	Respond to of 769670

I saw the discussion on the push-polls. Interesting stuff although nothing really new there. But if the Polls are bunk as you say, then you have no basis for your claim that the politicians have disregarded the public. You have made my point. Thanks. And as to the common knowledge blather, you questioned why I had not posted a link. Although obvious to the rest of us, it clearly needed explaining to you.

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (307729)	10/12/2002 4:29:53 PM
From: H-Man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Polls can be very good at answering the broad questions, provided they ask the right audience. Big questions like "Who are you going to vote for?" are highly accurate when asked of more than 1000 likely voters, during a weekday evening. The question at hand - "do you favor military action against Iraq?" is also a big question, the audience need only be a good cross-section of the public, which in this instance, is the case, as numerous polls done by different agencies all have similar results. The poll in question is not a push poll. Such polls stand out in glaring fashion, since seemingly similar polls will produce widely varying results. This is not the case on this issue. The polls become less accurate to the point of meaningless when more specific questions are asked, since how it is asked and the context in which it is asked can influence the question. For instance, asking the question: "Which will be more important to you when you vote, the economy or foreign policy?" - is likely to lead to the majority answering “the economy”. But if one asks the question: "Which will be more important to you when you vote, the economy or national security?" - is likely to lead to the opposite answer. We never saw a more poignant example of this as we saw during the Clinton years. My wife got one of these calls. It was really quite slick <g>. The questions went something like this: 1. How are you doing financially? 2.What do you think of the economy? 3.What kind of job do you think president Clinton is doing? And thus the personal vs. job approval rating was born. I'll note that the distinction seems to have left the political lexicon