SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (51732)10/13/2002 12:38:27 PM
From: kumar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It would be incredibly inappropriate for the President to talk to the American people about it personally

Why inappropriate ?

cheers, kumar



To: Ilaine who wrote (51732)10/13/2002 5:54:49 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Friedman is losing it, IMO.

Actually, and I know this won't surprise you, I thought the column was quite good. At least I liked the viewpoint expressed. I thought it took him a bit too long to get there. But then I'm not a columnist.

Saw a C-Span thingie late last night that featured the editorial page editors of the NYTimes, Wall Street Journal, and a California paper. One of the questions was how hard was it to give up the daily column. And, funny, Gail Collins and Paul Gigot both agreed it was a blessing. The release of not having the two or three times a week when they had to come up with something bright and original to say was liberating. Or so they said.

I don't find either of them very impressive. I would say some good things about Howell Raines here but that would lead my critics to take us into a several days rant about the good ol' boy.



To: Ilaine who wrote (51732)10/13/2002 9:13:53 PM
From: BCherry168  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 281500
 
CB, I'm way behind today, but did you know that a .223 is the same calibre as a M-16? The M-16 fires a .556 mm bullet, which is essentially the same as a center fire .223.

I understand the police have asked the Pentagon for the names of recently discharged service people with sniper training. Whoever this is apparently has good training. Hope they catch whoever it is soon.



To: Ilaine who wrote (51732)10/13/2002 11:49:34 PM
From: Karen Lawrence  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
According to my weapons expert friend, a 223 caliber rifle is not good for defense, a shotgun is. A 223 caliber rifle will not kill a deer at 200 yards unless someone fires an exceedingly lucky shot because its too light of a round. it was developed for military use and its pluses are speed and light weight of the rounds. It was designed to wound - it takes two to carry out one wounded - effectively taking out three.