Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (90565)	10/14/2002 12:41:46 PM
From: Ahda	Respond to of 116814

Therefore, a strong dollar/"managed to lower" gold scenario is the only IRAQ LONG TERM OVERTHROW AND OCCUPATION agendae dead-ahead, is the only one that makes sense to me. gold_tutor Your theory makes sense but you have to include the economy of the US in it in order for it to hold water.

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (90565)	10/14/2002 12:53:59 PM
From: Real Man	Respond to of 116814

Manipulated down? I tend to agree about gold, but currency markets are bigger than the Fed, and cannot be managed, especially when the manager (JPM) gets credit downgrades. Who do you think holds all these US dollar swaps? Now they will have to scale down their total derivative position due to the deterioration of their credit rating. I think there may be another move to 328, then they will take it down to 300 or below by the end of November. From there gold will explode up to 360 or so by March 2003. I tend to think this will be "THE" explosion, wave "C", that people on this thread contemplated for a long time

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (90565)	10/15/2002 1:12:36 AM
From: Jamey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116814

Gold_tutor, how do the short sellers manage to take a rise in gold and knock it down time after time? An unlimited money supply? When will there be enough interest in gold to overcome the short sellers? Santi

To: IngotWeTrust who wrote (90565)	12/17/2002 10:51:08 PM
From: Graystone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116814

Perfect predictions or ole crockery I am always amazed to see people try to steal the gold and claim a good call when they are 100% wrong. I see you are still busy making after the fact calls and patting your self on the back. Eric announced the price change the week before it happened, did you know that ? Since you are 100% wrong in this post, how do you integrate that with your claim that <<made sure every call I've ever made is a perfect call>>. This call is perfectly wrong. I will gladly await you spin on how your 100% wrong call is just perfect. Stealing the gold is not an option on SI, we can read you know. I really like your next prediction, if gold gets over $345.00 and stays over $345.00 for 3 out of 5 days, gold_tutor predicts gold will be $345.00.