Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (62637)	10/15/2002 2:54:07 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

You still have not explained what is mistaken about the example. <<Think of it this way: you steal something, you are caught, you experience a little embarrassment and give back the 5 dollars. What is there to motivate anyone to reform their ways, if they have been malicious or negligent? Nothing. First, there is no real risk, since even if you are caught, it comes to little; second, society has just said to you that it doesn't take stealing very seriously.>> What is the motivation to "reform?" Whoever caught you knows you to be a thief. He may have told others. People don't want to associate with thieves. You lose friends, job opportunities, you could go to jail, all sorts of bad things worth more than five dollars. Plus you are fostering by your participation a world in which thieves run rampant and one of them might steal from you, maybe more than five dollars. A rational person recognizes that thievery is a sub-optimal approach to life. This may take a few lessons or some explanation, but then that's what mothers' knees are for.