SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (52392)10/16/2002 12:38:10 PM
From: carranza2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
As for a 'wider war', I have seen no sign that the US would get mixed up in the Israeli/Hizbullah/Syrian war, why should it?

I can see a scenario where Arafat and the Palestinians needs to be controlled by the Israelis after the conflict with Iraq starts, using up subtantial Israeli resources that might otherwise go to fighting Hizbollah in Lebanon. If Syria participates in the fight with Hizbollah, Israel might very well be stretched thinly. If things go badly for it, US help might be necessary. Ergo, wider, more anarchic conflict.

That is the one scenario that worries me.

Give me good reasons why it can't happen, I need to sleep well.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (52392)10/16/2002 12:40:00 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
the Israelis would be fighting both Hizbullah and Iranians in Lebanon.

This is the critical "Sideshow," IMO. I don't see how this can be avoided once we move on Iraq. I am sure Sharon is going to bring it up on his visit here.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (52392)10/16/2002 1:14:04 PM
From: jcky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
As for a 'wider war', I have seen no sign that the US would get mixed up in the Israeli/Hizbullah/Syrian war, why should it?

It is not often we agree on many points concerning Mideast foreign policy, but I think this issue is pretty cut and dry. No sane American administration will ever get involved in an Israeli/Hizbullah/Syrian war. The only exception I can fathom is the very remote possibility that Israel is losing the war and her existence comes into question. Israel trumps the nuclear card and Uncle Sam reacts to prevent a Samson option.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (52392)10/16/2002 11:14:14 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hi Nadine Carroll; Re: "... Rafsanjani said that the first thing Iran would do with a bomb is drop it on Tel Aviv."

You've completely misinterpreted what Rafsanjani said before, now you do it again. I guess if you repeat the same lie over and over it starts to become believable. (Who was it that said that?)

-- Carl

P.S.
google.com