Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (309544)	10/17/2002 9:54:08 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Lies? I'll show you some of Tommie's lies - which he now claims to not remember: "well j-f-snitchy, It's official, President Bush won the popular vote by over 6 million. Certified Loser gore is called certified loser gore." Message 18124154 "Yes and President Bush won and beat his loser opponent by over 6 million votes in the "popular vote" for electors." Message 18120610 --------------------------------------------------------- Another bald-faced Tommie lie: "... I never wrote "16 million population votes"." Message 18122881 (But here's Tommie posting his "16 million population vote" lie, one of about 50 times, LOL): "...Gore - 127 million Bush - 143 million Populatiion Vote plurality of 16 million" Message 18111163 ------------------------------------------------------- [The careful reader will note in all of this that the 'population of counties' is not considered 'votes'. Only votes are votes. All these so-called statistics show is that in Bush-won counties... there were large numbers of people who didn't vote... and therefore, registered no votes. To discern which way they would have voted had they bothered to get off their sofas and go to the ballots would require a mindreader - which Tommie obviously isn't - he still has problems with these simple statistics.] -------------------------------------------------------- Another one of my posts to Tommie: WHAT'S A "VOTE", POOR TOMMIE? HOW ARE THEY MEASURED? WHAT DO CRIME STATISTICS HAVE TO DO WITH CERTIFIED VOTES? WHAT DOES THE SIZE OF A COUNTY... OR IT'S RAINFALL... OR NUMBER OF INHABITANTS WHO HAVE SILICON BREAST IMPLANTS, ETC. HAVE TO DO WITH CERTIFIED VOTES? Message 18111129 ----------------------------------------------------------- Another post of mine to Tommie: Yep. You 'been "habitually lying", I'm sure that's what you recall. Like claiming that Bush "won the Presidency with a population vote margin of 16 million over Gore"... when any idiot knows: 1) There is no such thing as a 'population vote'. 2) Gore's popular vote* margin over Bush was certified by the Government at + 540,540. What a dodgy old rube you are... can't even remember your own lies anymore. Message 18104415 --------------------------------------------------------- Tommie lies yet again. He claimed that said "I say dirt could vote 6 and maybe 7 times" >>> Note to Tommie! I never claimed dirt could vote, YOU did... and I never asked if it could vote "6 or 7 times". >>> YOUR HALLUCINATION! >>> I asked you only one question: Do you understand what the word 'vote' means? >>> From your repeated posts claiming a "16 million 'population vote' victory for Bush, it is apparent you DON'T know what a 'vote' is. >>> Sad, so sad, the dribble that emits forth from your fevered, gin-soaked brain.... Message 18112224 -------------------------------------------------------- From another one of my posts: I did fully explain the issue... in excruciating detail to him... over MULTIPLE POSTS... over SEVERAL DAYS. If you want to back-trace what must be 30 or 40 posts to him on this issue, over a week or so, feel free. But you may find it far easier to just browse to the link he provided to support his RIDICULOUS CLAIM THAT BUSH WON A "POPULATION VOTE" VICTORY OVER GORE BY "16 MILLION VOTES"... and read all that's on the Web site. You will - of course - note that there is NO SUCH THING AS A "POPULATION VOTE" (the site lists things like 'crime statistics' and the net area of various counties, as the support for this joke.) Other posters here have pointed out to the hallucinating Tommie that this is a joke... put forward to needle other, equally spurious arguments advanced by various Democratic partisans... but he either falls to understand what a 'vote' is... or else he just likes lying to people and raising hell. As far as him asking anything of me... it's a fairly lameoid trick of his: he refuses - over a week or more - to answer MY PRIOR QUESTION to explain how any of this 'crime statistics' stuffs amounts to 'votes', then siezes upon my concatanation of his two ridiculous claims that 1) Bush won a "population vote" by 16 million, and 2) the square area (amount of 'dirt') in a county, and the crime statistics there, amount somehow to legal 'votes'....... I concatanated these ridiculous and unsupported premises into an understandable (and, I think funnier) shorthand for Tommie's fraudulent claims: that he wants to give the vote to 'dirt clods'. He understands this fully, and pulls an old trick of his by referring only to 'dirt clods'... while refusing to explain or justify his original psychotic claim of a "16 million vote margin for Bush"... based upon crime statistics and the area of counties, and other brick-a-brack not directly related to election voting. As I've pointed out: ONLY VOTES THAT ARE ACTUALLY CAST ARE COUNTED IN DECIDING ELECTIONS... PEOPLE WHO STAY HOME AND DON'T VOTE ARE NOT COUNTED AS 'VOTES'. I'm sure you, Zero, have no problem understanding the word 'vote'. This idiotic claim of his is so ridiculous that I'm sure you also understand why he has refused to answer my very first question: <Tommie, what is a 'vote'.> If you need further explanation of the fraud and FUD he is attempting to spread... just browse to the Web site he linked, and read the joke yourself. (I particularly liked the part about 'crime statistics'!) (Try to find THAT in the Constitution!) Message 18111664