Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : My House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (2901)	10/20/2002 1:18:41 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7689

omg, do I really have to use g's for THAT!? Say it isn't so. But seriously, folks, this is so true. I must commend your devotion to the constitution: NOT ONLY THAT, BUT it is OUTRAGEOUS that police would dare plan on stopping and questioning EVERYONE found with a high-powered rifle in the vicinity of any of these shootings! A clear violation of 2nd Amendment rights! Edit: What do you suppose Minetta would say was the difference? I can't see any, unless it's that cars don't have feelings. But heck, their owners do. Another edit: The joke part is that not profiling for screening in airports, for example, is as crazy as it would be to be searching yellow cabs equally with white vans. The serious part is that the joke is really happening.