SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (53624)10/21/2002 9:56:15 AM
From: LindyBill  Respond to of 281500
 
Bill terms it a pro-Clinton book

The review I posted with that comment said that the book revealed the Clinton Admin mistakes. Here is a Reason column on the "Mistakes were Made" Brigade.

Editors' Links
Taking Responsibility... NOT!
By Ronald Bailey

FBI Director Robert Mueller III and CIA Director George Tenet testified yesterday before Congress' Joint Intelligence Committee about the failures to prevent the atrocities of 9/ll. Pressed by Senator Carl Levin (D-MI), Tenet testified, "If anyone is going to take responsibility, I take responsibility."

But what does "taking responsibility" mean in today's Federal government? Apparently, it means that when you and your agency fail, you get to demand a bigger budget, more bureaucrats, and more intrusive power over the lives of American citizens. The more you fail, the more you get.

Instead of taking names and kicking ass in the failed agencies, the usual Federal government response is to do an end run around them and create whole new bureaucracies, in this case, the massive and largely redundant Department of Homeland Defense. If the existing agencies aimed at dealing with a problem don't work, just conjure up a new one?it's lot nicer and easier than firing people and reforming old ones.

Of course, Tenet's non-responsible way of "taking responsibility" has plenty of precedent. Consider how Janet Reno took responsibility for the monumental FBI and ATF screw up at the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, TX. Did she resign? No. Did she fire anybody? No.

Similarly, Mueller and Tenet informed the Congressional panel yesterday that no one had been disciplined or fired for the FBI's and CIA's 9/ll failures. But our federal guardians have not been entirely idle; the National Counterintelligence Executive issued this attractive poster ncix.gov to inspire greater vigilance.

I feel safer, don't you?

Ronald Bailey is Reason's science correspondent.



To: JohnM who wrote (53624)10/21/2002 1:37:13 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
~OT~ The New York Times columnist and a professor at Princeton Paul Krugman writes an interesting 11-part article in the recent Sunday Times Magazine...

<<...Income inequality in America has now returned to the levels of the 1920's. Inherited wealth doesn't yet play a big part in our society, but given time -- and the repeal of the estate tax -- we will grow ourselves a hereditary elite just as set apart from the concerns of ordinary Americans as old Horace Havemeyer. And the new elite, like the old, will have enormous political power.

Kevin Phillips concludes his book ''Wealth and Democracy'' with a grim warning: ''Either democracy must be renewed, with politics brought back to life, or wealth is likely to cement a new and less democratic regime -- plutocracy by some other name.'' It's a pretty extreme line, but we live in extreme times. Even if the forms of democracy remain, they may become meaningless. It's all too easy to see how we may become a country in which the big rewards are reserved for people with the right connections; in which ordinary people see little hope of advancement; in which political involvement seems pointless, because in the end the interests of the elite always get served.

Am I being too pessimistic? Even my liberal friends tell me not to worry, that our system has great resilience, that the center will hold. I hope they're right, but they may be looking in the rearview mirror. Our optimism about America, our belief that in the end our nation always finds its way, comes from the past -- a past in which we were a middle-class society. But that was another country...>>

The entire article ' For Richer ' is worth consideration and it can be read on the Times website...

nytimes.com



To: JohnM who wrote (53624)10/21/2002 3:47:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
~OT~..."Heartburn" Races That Keep Bush and Daschle Up at Night

BusinessWeek Online
Monday October 21, 9:56 am ET
biz.yahoo.com

As one of the most unpredictable midterm elections in modern history winds to a close, both parties are in a state of high anxiety. Democrats are nervous about holding their one-seat majority in the Senate, with seven races too close to call. Republicans, meanwhile, are seeing their grip on the nation's governorships slip away, which could complicate President George W. Bush's governor-centric reelection strategy in 2004.

No wonder Bush and his Democratic nemesis, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle [D-S.D.]--a possible Presidential candidate in 2004--are traipsing across the country to buck up their party's candidates. Still, a few match-ups have a special resonance for America's most powerful Republican and Democrat--contests where defeat would spell personal repudiation. These are the "heartburn races" keeping Bush and Daschle up at night:

FAMILY AFFAIR. There's more than a governor's seat at stake in Florida. Also on the line: the Bush family's honor and bragging rights to the state that put George W. Bush over the top in 2000. A year ago, the President's younger brother Jeb seemed to be sailing to reelection. But a state budget crisis, a second election plagued by voting snafus, and a child-welfare scandal have propelled Democratic newcomer Bill McBride to within striking distance. "A lot of people see this as a surrogate of the 2004 election or as the first test of Bush's strength," says Susan A. MacManus, professor of political science at the University of South Florida at Tampa.

The reason: The Sunshine State is vital to the President's reelection prospects. With California and New York solidly Democratic in national elections, Republicans need Texas and Florida to remain in the White House. Without a brother running the state, George W. could be faced with a hostile Democratic Secretary of State filling Katherine Harris' seat at the recount table next time.

The President has pulled out all the stops to help Jeb and will be heading south at least two more times before Election Day. Bush also has showered federal funds on Florida. Earlier this year, he announced that Washington would spend $235 million to buy oil and gas rights to stop drilling off the Florida coast and in the Everglades. And the Administration moved several hundred NASA jobs from California to Florida. If Jeb gets whupped in November, about the only upside is that it won't be by Janet Reno.

DEEP IN THE HEART. Former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk is just the kind of candidate the White House covets: a pro-business moderate, a former big-city chief executive, and a longtime Bush ally. There's only one problem--Kirk is a Democrat. And he's giving Bush's handpicked choice in the Texas Senate race more of a contest than the Bushies had anticipated when Senator Phil Gramm announced his retirement.

Despite the Lone Star State's GOP proclivities, Kirk, a charismatic African American, has kept on the heels of Republican John Cornyn by building a coalition of urban minorities and suburban centrists. But Bush is doing all he can to give his candidate an edge. He has raised millions at fund-raisers and appears in TV ads. Family members have also been springing up like Texas bluebonnets, ranging from First Lady Laura Bush to First Mom Barbara Bush. Quips University of Texas government professor Bruce Buchanan: "They're essentially sending anyone who can walk, run, or fly to campaign for Cornyn."

SURROGATE SHOWDOWN. The President isn't the only one who faces a potential embarrassment in his home state. Daschle's South Dakota Senate colleague and protege, Tim Johnson, is trying to fend off a strong challenge from Republican Representative John R. Thune. Bush personally recruited the congressman to run for the Senate over a cozy White House dinner, sealing the deal with a dessert of chocolate bonbons.

Bush's involvement has given the Senate race an added dimension: a surrogate showdown between a Presidential wannabe and a President who carried the state in a 2000 landslide. "South Dakotans are essentially voting for their President or their majority leader," says Charles E. Cook Jr., editor of The Cook Political Report, a nonpartisan newsletter.

It's a race Daschle is taking personally. In an effort to remain his state's favorite son--and retain his job as Senate leader--Daschle has campaigned frequently alongside Johnson. He, too, has tried to channel legislative favors by ushering a measure through the Senate that would provide $6 billion in drought relief to South Dakota ranchers. To drive a wedge between Thune and Bush, Daschle is quick to point out how Thune, who is campaigning as the candidate with the ear of the Prez, failed to persuade the White House to back the massive aid package. Instead, Bush is offering a scaled-down, $752 million relief plan.

Meanwhile, both parties are spending money hand over fist to promote their candidates: By raising more than $10 million combined as of Sept. 30, the matchup is on track to be the most expensive per-capita Senate race in history.

BURNED BY THE TORCH. On Sept. 23, Daschle traveled to New Jersey to campaign on behalf of embattled incumbent Senator Robert G. Torricelli. He might as well have stayed home. Within days, "the Torch" had withdrawn from the race amid an ethics scandal that just wouldn't go away. To further complicate matters, Daschle played a key role in the embarrassing scramble to find a clean candidate willing to replace Torricelli on the ballot.

Even though the Dems' new standard-bearer, former Senator Frank Lautenberg, is a longtime enemy of Torricelli, Republican Doug Forrester argues that the switcheroo ties the two together in a political conspiracy. "Forrester is running against the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine," says Jack Oliver, the deputy chairman of the Republican National Committee. "This is a great opportunity for New Jersey to have a clean break with machine politics."

The stakes in the battle for the Senate almost can't be overstated. If Democrats maintain their majority, Bush will have enormous difficulty with his political agenda, including tax reform, a pro-drilling energy plan, and a conservative judiciary. With a single seat separating the parties, tight races in states from Minnesota to New Hampshire could make the difference. Daschle and Bush want to win them all. But for reasons both personal and political, some states are more important than others. Just ask Al Gore, who lost his home state of Tennessee in 2000, and with it, the Presidency.



To: JohnM who wrote (53624)10/22/2002 9:40:03 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Did "McCarthyism" cost Linus Pauling a Nobel for DNA? sure looks like it. Fascinating review of a book on the discovery.
newyorker.com