SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : DC Sniper - Theories? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1702)10/23/2002 1:13:32 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Respond to of 2746
 
Jeffery,

re: If this were a terrorist, don't you think he'd be calling us all infidels and demanding his anti-American propaganda be plastered over every front page

Yes he would and he'd work on that martyrdom thing by killing himself. Got to get to seventy virgins you know.



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1702)10/23/2002 2:30:38 AM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2746
 
The "not able to electronically comply" may be something bigger than previously speculated. Who knows what he asked for, electronically?(!) It could have been a simple email, or the offshore banking stuff as previously suggested. Or maybe some other more vastly unusual thing — perhaps he wanted a "protected" remote-televised interview with Connie Chung (in a vein similar to Unibomber publishing his "Manifesto")? A setup with a PC-Cam, chatting with Connie about this and that, unfettered by local police entanglements. Definitly not "electronically possible". He could have wanted any number of "electronic" options. "Electronic" encompasses a vast world, Connie Chung being the least of which...



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1702)10/23/2002 9:35:14 AM
From: IEarnedIt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2746
 
Thought you would like this Jeff.

<<And now, this breaking news report on something

By HOWARD TROXLER, Times Columnist
© St. Petersburg Times
published October 23, 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No, as a matter of fact, I am NOT trying to be funny at a time like this.

* * *
ANCHOR: Now, this breaking news. Something has reportedly happened. Details are sketchy, and we really don't have any idea of what it might be, but let's show these impressive aerial shots from our helicopter. Now let's go to our correspondent in the field to tell us that he doesn't know anything. Bob?

CORRESPONDENT: Paula? I'm sorry, I couldn't really hear you, but let me say that out here we really have no idea of what's going on. But my sources tell me that something definitely has happened. All I can say is that we'll find out as soon as possible. In the meantime, everybody should stay tuned to CNN.

ANCHOR: Thank you. As you can see, CNN sources now are confirming to CNN that something has, indeed, happened. For further analysis on this, let's go to CNN's consulting criminologist. Doctor, what does this tell you about the character of the perpetrator?

CRIMINOLOGIST: Of course, it is too early to know what this something might be, but in any case I would say that clearly, this is a disturbed individual. I would say this is a cry for attention, if not for help.

ANCHOR: Is it possible that we are talking about someone who might be, say, watching CNN at this very minute?

CRIMINOLOGIST: Doubtlessly so.

ANCHOR: We understand now that the police chief is having his briefing. Let's go there live.

CHIEF: I am here to say, I have nothing to say.

REPORTERS: Tell us all the secret things that you don't want to tell us.

CHIEF: That would jeopardize the case.

REPORTERS: Here, let us ask a bunch of speculative questions that still mean, tell us anyway.

CHIEF: No. Next briefing in 15 minutes.

ANCHOR: We'll be right back.

* * *
(Cut to CNN commercial showing clips from political talk show.)

WHINY DEMOCRAT: There's no doubt in my mind this sniper is a Republican.

SMUG REPUBLICAN: Clearly he is a product of Clinton-Democrat degeneracy.

ANNOUNCER: Hear the issues discussed in depth, six times nightly, on CNN.

* * *
(Back to broadcast)

* * *
ANCHOR: And now here's a roundup of other news. There's war with Iraq, the midterm elections for control of Congress, a reeling economy, forgotten corporate scandals and the World Series. Okay, that covers that. Now back to our round-the-clock coverage. Wait a minute . . . we're hearing now that there might be a new fact in the case.

(Crawl across bottom of screen: NEW FACT IN CASE...)

ANCHOR: Let's go back to Bob in the field. Bob?

CORRESPONDENT: That's right, Paula, sources are now telling CNN that something definitely has happened. They're urging the public to stay calm, but, honestly, I don't see any basis for that kind of statement.

ANCHOR: All right. We have confirmation that, indeed, something has happened. After this break, we'll be going to our panel of CNN experts from the Institute of People Who Talk On Television For A Living. And be sure to tune in tonight to Larry King Live, where Larry will talk about the day's events with John Walsh and Carrot Top.

* * *
It's me talking for real now.

Here is my idea, which I hope my friends in radio and other local media will support: Let's stop watching cable news during this ridiculous orgy of speculative coverage.

I'm not saying we should ignore these terrible events. Watch your regular local news on our broadcast stations. Check out the Internet, if you'd like. Am I leaving out anything here? Oh, yeah. Read the paper. Or don't.

But don't reward this idiocy any more. For a brief, shining few days, let's give the cable news networks the lowest ratings of any major metropolitan market in the nation.

* * *
A sniper on the loose, a nation on edge. Count on CNN to bring you the whole story. Now, more than ever!

-- Actual CNN promotion

<<http://www.sptimes.com/2002/10/23/Columns/And_now__this_breakin.shtml>>

:-)
JD



To: Jeffrey S. Mitchell who wrote (1702)10/23/2002 10:20:02 AM
From: Victor Lazlo  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2746
 
<<If this were a terrorist, don't you think he'd be calling us all infidels and demanding his anti-American propaganda be plastered over every front page, or else...? >>

Did they do that before or after Sept 11? No.