Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : My House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (3204)	10/29/2002 12:29:20 PM
From: Neenny	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7689

My score said my life expectancy was 85 years. Mike did the test and his came back at 84 years. Someone commented that the test was "well done." Mike is a good indication of how slanted the test is. It takes in no current health issues. Mike is, as you know a type 1 diabetic, currently approaching end stage renal failure. Based on the test his life expectancy is 84. (I like that test's way of thinking!! but) I think the test must be intended for those people who are currently absolutely healthy! Did I miss that in the fine print somewhere?? Jane

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (3204)	10/29/2002 12:51:46 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7689

I got a 92.2 year life expectancy. Ain't no way I want to live that long. If anyone would like to trade scores, I can be bribed.

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (3204)	10/29/2002 1:08:48 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 7689

Dog years? :-)