Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (64841)	10/30/2002 7:55:15 AM
From: one_less	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 82486

Yes, it seems simple enough to me. X is convinced that the it is at the core of fanatacism, which to me seems an obvious contradiction. People who participate in society without conscience to guide them are likely to display psycopathic or sociopathic behavior. This is not just my opinion, it is the generally accepted view on this well researched subject. People who engage conscience to deliberate over difficult choices are not likely to behave in the extreme. X is trying to redefine the application of conscience to mean behaving with adherence to some moral or ethical code, or something. It is impossible to have a meaningful discussion when the participants are constantly redefining the terms in order to talk past one another. In any event, it seems this topic has had enough coverage.