SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : BS Bar & Grill - Open 24 Hours A Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1353)10/30/2002 4:26:51 PM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6901
 
You have gone back and forth with a few people on "What Happened at Camp David?" Lets listen to Clinton himself. From WSJ.com

>>>>You may recall the big front-page New York Times story that had anonymous ex-Clintonites saying, no, Arafat didn?t walk away from a historic deal, things were complicated, don?t blame him for wrecking the peace process, blah, blah, blah. This was when a significant chunk of the world was finally turning against Arafat, with Palestinians blowing up Israelis by the score, and the PLO chairman as intransigent as ever. The front-page story was a lifeline to Arafat and his ? infinitely numerous ? apologists.

Waal, the other night, speaking at a function, the ex-president himself said, ?What Arafat did in walking away from Ehud Barak?s [peace] offer is not the wave of the future. It is the last gasp of an old worldview.?

Of course, Clinton was speaking before a Jewish group in New York. Who knows what he?d say in Dearborn? Then again, we can guess.<<<<<<<
nationalreview.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (1353)10/30/2002 5:35:32 PM
From: William B. Kohn  Respond to of 6901
 
Many Israeli's wish that a government could come to power which would not require the religious parties to form a government. Stipends to Shas as an example and military exemptions are two issues which drive many batty!

bill