Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: (Bob) Zumbrunnen who wrote (29553)	10/30/2002 11:12:43 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

You guys do a terrific job with the spammers, and now that I'm spending more time there, I'm noticing more and more that I like a lot.

To: (Bob) Zumbrunnen who wrote (29553)	10/31/2002 10:47:40 AM
From: Fred C. Dobbs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

The idea is to take a proactive approach to heading off spammers right at the front door. Seems to work. Does the same policy exist for bashers? Being excited or believing in a stock does not necessarily make one a pumper as some bashers like to believe. Opposing views should be backed by some sort of qualified opinion or facts. Not just cause "I said so". Does anyone moderate the moderators on IHub? If the moderator states a stock is a scam and a POS, would there be any unbiased discussion available on a thread they themselves are policing? I thought the whole idea was to avoid that type of distraction and concentrate on actual facts. Believing or not believing or personal opinions is not really the topic, if the company's plan is workable is? If so, why? If not, why not? The juvenile stuff can stay in the schoolyard. Doesn't add to one's credibility. No thread will ever be perfect, hope your's does well. Sure like the jail idea. Take care Ron