SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lucretius who wrote (201889)11/3/2002 4:45:38 PM
From: Zeev Hed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
No there is nothing that will "heal" the basic capacity excess in the worldwide economy they can do right now, but to get demand to very slowly inch up (which it is). As for interest rates and borrowing costs, an increase of .25% in the fed base rate will have no impact on these costs, those that are not let in the borrowing windows, will still be barred, and those that are allowed in, the impact of such raise will be minimal. Most corporate borrowing is tied to LIBOR anyhow, and we are so much lower than in Euroland and the UK, that such a minimal rise will have absolutely minimal impact on domestic borrowing costs. Volker did not raise rates to 20% and kept them there, he raised them in a spike fashion signaling psychologically to the market, more than actually increasing borrowing costs for less than a quarter. The psychological signal had its desired impact, and the new direction post the 20% peak (direction of rate starting down) was more important to the market than the actual peak. We got a very nice bull move after that raise, though not yet the start of a bull market (that took till August 82).

The economy is in a transition period where the excess of capacity is waiting for demand to catch up with it, and that imbalance simply takes time to correct. Precipitating a financial collapse as you suggest, will cut from GDP for years to come a solid 5% to 10%, not a desirable outcome, unless you love seeing unemployment at 10% and higher. It is stupid to kill 20% of the participants in the economy just to get rid of the 1% to 2% inefficient players, these will die their own slow but sure death on their own, no need to precipitate it.

Zeev