Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : BS Bar & Grill - Open 24 Hours A Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (2017)	11/3/2002 8:53:43 PM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 6901

>>The Need Not to Know<< Methinks the need not to know has political blinders. Maybe after Tuesday, those who don't want to know will resume using their commons sense.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (2017)	11/3/2002 9:24:56 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 6901

It will be most interesting to see when those who currently "don't see a need to know," finally realize they have been wrong all along...wonder if it will be too late for the world's peoples as we know them now? >>>>>>>But what about al Qaeda? When I heard President Bush declare in his Oct. 7 speech in Cincinnati that Iraq had trained al Qaeda members in bombmaking, poisons and deadly gases, I went asking the all-purpose reporter's question: Sez who? The answer: Sez the CIA, when pressed to the mat. >>>>>>>>>>>> "The president's speech was cleared line by line by several levels of the CIA, including the director," George Tenet. So says a senior, knowledgeable U.S. official. "There is no doubt about its accuracy." >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But Bush's case that Baghdad played a central role in establishing and running the infrastructure of international terrorism that contributed to Sept. 11 is undeniable. Unless, that is, there is a need not to know.