SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : BS Bar & Grill - Open 24 Hours A Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Condor who wrote (2183)11/4/2002 5:31:54 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6901
 
Where did you learn they were deep and what's "deep"?

I generally look at the news reports and normally provide the depth of the epicenter..

But I have to admit that any perspective that I have is biased by the typically shallow tremors along the San Adreas (down to around 15 kms deep such as Northridge).

As for my "handle", I'm surprised you didn't do a websearch.. It was more politically correct than "Stormbringer".. Of course, I could have used the author's last name, but that would have probably created some controversy. (wink, wink, nudge, nudge)

Hawk



To: Condor who wrote (2183)11/4/2002 6:49:45 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6901
 
I took a look at this website, and most of the recent large earthquakes world wide were at the 33 km depth. Don't have any idea whether that's deep, or whether there's any significance.
earthquake.usgs.gov


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News