Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MSI who wrote (16582)	11/5/2002 10:38:42 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

The Soviet Union did not suffer economic collapse, it suffered political collapse. Now, economics was a big factor, due to consumer dissatisfaction, but part of the reason for that was that they were spending about a quarter of GDP on their military establishment, and we were spending about a fifth of that. Thus, the prospect of a big economic squeeze was worrisome. On the other hand, the deficiencies of the system were partially made up by an extensive black market, so that GDP was under-reported due to the underground nature of a lot of economic exchange. It is therefore hard to predict what might have happened in alternate scenarios. It is, however, almost certain that without strong strategic competition, there would have been less pressure for reform, in the end, and that without a good deal of corruption, the system would have teetered moreso. How long the Soviet Union could have limped along as a threat is anybody's guess. If they had adopted Chinese marketization, while retaining political control, they might have gone on forever. I stand by my statements.