SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : BS Bar & Grill - Open 24 Hours A Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BigBull who wrote (2454)11/6/2002 5:36:52 PM
From: Ilaine  Respond to of 6901
 
>>I will have learned that reporter should not be trusted.<<

Or maybe it's a deliberate attempt at rattling Saddam's cage.

Gaming it out, my guess is that the pending resolution is acceptable to the US and France, and that China and Russia will abstain, and it will pass.

The wild card is Saddam -- what will he do? Does he think we are bluffing? Will he try to call what he perceives as our bluff?

Do a google search using "queen's order" and "daily telegraph," and you'll see it got a lot of attention.

If it's disinformation, blame MI6, not the reporter.



To: BigBull who wrote (2454)11/6/2002 5:42:23 PM
From: maceng2  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6901
 
There is a great deal of mistrust of the Royal Family on anything right now. You just have to read my links. Princess Diana's untimely death is an issue far from over.

That stuff I posted was not just a joke. It goes back lots of years.

/edit btw why is Larouche so anti British?? is he French or something??? his political site certainly suggests he has something stuck in his craw about the British Elite. As if the French don't have any -g-


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News