SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bill who wrote (66138)11/7/2002 1:32:59 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 82486
 
Here's another beaut!!!

To:TigerPaw who wrote (5233)
From: Mephisto Thursday, Nov 7, 2002 1:07 PM
Respond to of 5237

John Ascroft's hymn for the Bush administration supports violence and terrorism.
I wouldn't be surprised if John Ascroft owned two dozen Bushmaster rifles,
the rifle the Washington sniper used.
When it comes to violence, breaking laws and shredding the US Constitution, Ashcroft and
Bush will do it so that they can endorse their violent views of the world on Americans
They act like Osama and Hamas these days.

During his confirmation, John Ascroft promised that he wouldn't endorse assault weapons, but
he doesn't enforce background checks at gun shows so he supports the very terrorists that he
puts in jail because terrorists buy guns at gun shows and ship them out of the country.


Message 18208097



To: Bill who wrote (66138)11/12/2002 11:15:37 AM
From: YlangYlangBreeze1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Gee, and I thought that the only "qualifications" for voting had to do with age, citizenship, lack of felony convictions...

So do you not vote on that which you feel "unqualified?" I rely on other best sources to analyze and summarize their impact so that I may vote as best I may.

Interesting that you admire Clinton's physical characteristics such, that you are convinced people voted for him on that alone. Does it then go to say that Bush lost votes for his horrid little weasel face, and not just his cretinous mis-articulation?